<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Humanist → Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-80a8155e" type="application/json"/><link>http://humanist.disqus.com/</link><description>Computer Science, Business, Blogging, and Technology Blog by Luke Hoersten</description><atom:link href="http://humanist.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:48:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Hong Kong, Sheung Wan, Day 1</title><link>http://humani.st/hong-kong-sheung-wan-day-1/#comment-715343858</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We're waiting for more updates.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:48:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Hong Kong, Sheung Wan, Day 1</title><link>http://humani.st/hong-kong-sheung-wan-day-1/#comment-713585727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great pictures.  Are you over your jet lag yet?  Keep blogging.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:37:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-685411706</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've found myself using 'that' all the time my whole life. I actually think the use of 'that' is more like an unused if statement, after analysis one realises it serves no purpose but still expired energy figuring it out. I agree the usage of 'that' is a tip or 'cheat' button theory is along the lines that I taught myself to use it as a shortcut to acceptable written language at an early age. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Programmer too&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Perkimon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-628266739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had to have my tendency to overuse the word 'that' pointed out to me (about six months ago) before I reversed the habit. It became a habit when I started typing essays and assignments at school rather than writing them (about year/ grade 10). I found the word 'that' very easy to type on the keyboard and it became a "conjunction" word which bought me some thinking time while still maintaining a typing "flow".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:51:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-525457906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you are looking for reasons your emails aren't taken seriously, try to read through what you wrote here. Very difficult to follow. You are all over the place. Too many breaks with commas. Too many statements in parenthesis. I took a class on business writing. Learned things are much better understood when short and concise. Don't make people think too hard to understand your meaning. For what it's worth . . . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bosch63</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:35:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jawbone UP: Not Ready for Christmas</title><link>http://humani.st/?p=432#comment-386462712</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I ended up going with a Fitbit (&lt;a href="http://www.fitbit.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.fitbit.com&lt;/a&gt;). Looks like they have their business together quite a bit better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke Hoersten</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:30:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jawbone UP: Not Ready for Christmas</title><link>http://humani.st/?p=432#comment-383447165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Anything new, since your last update?  Me too wanted to buy some UP's for Xmas, but... think it will be impossible... :-/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jlm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 09:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-314134700</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You could eliminate "really" and "just" as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vera Haddan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-262147966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You shouldn't just arbitrarily pick "who", "which" or "that." There are rules of grammar to be considered when choosing between them. &lt;a href="http://www.grammarbook.com/grammar/whoVwhVt.asp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.grammarbook.com/gra...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, the word "theory" is overused and it cheapens the meaning.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eg2333</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 13:10:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-191442785</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interestingly some of the most brilliant people I know overuse "that" in their sentence structures.  Especially techical people because they write a lot about technical objects and things.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tx_cybergal</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:39:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life of Pi Quotes</title><link>http://humani.st/life-of-pi-quotes/#comment-158919906</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recommended follow-up reading - Angel Just-Rights, Rebecca Parker - ISBN 9781849914000&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Author1</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 06:08:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life of Pi Quotes</title><link>http://humani.st/life-of-pi-quotes/#comment-97526821</link><description>&lt;p&gt; It's important in life to conclude things properly. Only then can you let go. Otherwise you are left with words you should have said but never did, and your heart is heavy with remorse. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ellie</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-57575334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Luke, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;      I graduated from Albright in 1972.  There, I was exposed to some prose or poesy entitled something like "That, that, that, and, that" or some such.  I can not rediscover the piece, but ever since, I have been driven, Fudd Style, cwazy by writing at EVERY level using enough thats to bloat, by at least 5%, a given sentence, phrase, article, editorial, manuscript, anthology, book, world history, history of civilization,  history of the universe, or collection of writings in the last five millennia.  "That" is the written version of the oral "um"; a simple pause will fill the void and act as unaspirated punctuation.  I suppose that I will endure until I meet that long road that will take me home.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Des124</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:21:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8220;That&amp;#8221; Overuse</title><link>http://humani.st/that-overuse/#comment-48721379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This one has been gnawing on my brains for months!   It's why I searched up the topic this minute.  I used to have a problem with people not taking me seriously, in my emails (I work online), so I started pulling them apart, to examine the way I 'spoke'...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Ooooh! -does a Yosemite Sam dance-!  I want to show you, but I can *not*, for the life of me, find where I first read about the chronic overuse of "that"! I must keep plugging along -- it had such a rare (that I can find) observation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The article mentioned something about the "that"-habit giving one's writings too passive a tone?  Something like, if I said, "I think that I will go to the lake," it comes off as sounding less decisive than "I think I will go to the lake."  (Even better, "I will go to the lake!"... lol, tell it with gusto, now.) &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Another example: If I were to follow the above sentence with, "The rules are that we can't go swimming in it," it would be, in some way, pawning off responsibility or acceptance of my own assertion.  It could be construed as my having a subtext, as well: 'Sure, the rules on THAT sign, over there -- which aren't the rules this person right here, ME!, goes by -- say not to swim...  *Splash*!'&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Things like that (or is it just"Things like?" =D)... or something.  Gee whiz, I hope you know what I mean.  I can tell, just by the impressions the different sentences leave on me, (that) that (oooh, double-"that"s!) concept is basically true; I just have a hard time articulating it!  So, I must keep plugging along... anyway(s), I thought you might appreciate the input.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Bad Ellipsis-ing-ly,&lt;br&gt;"Jaxxy".  =D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaxxy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:12:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ubuntu Nvidia Compiz &amp;#8220;Black Window Bug&amp;#8221; Fix</title><link>http://humani.st/ubuntu-nvidia-compiz-black-window-bug-fix/#comment-38876967</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I encountered this with a 256MB nvidia 6600GT AGP card when the 'AGP Aperture size' in the BIOS was set to a value lower than the amount of memory on the video card. After upping the value in the BIOS, the problem went away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">an onymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Disqus Validation Errors on WordPress</title><link>http://humani.st/fix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress/#comment-35498458</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Did this ever get rolled into the plugin? I'm getting XHTML validation errors on my blog that seem related to what these patches would have fixed. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Chen</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:20:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Make Erlang a Functional Language?</title><link>http://humani.st/why-make-erlang-a-functional-language/#comment-23895081</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">EStau</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:48:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Base32 Encoding in C#, Java</title><link>http://humani.st/base32-encoding-in-c-java/#comment-21393280</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Minor comment:&lt;br&gt;current_byte = (data [i] &amp;gt;= 0) ? data [i] : (data [i] + 256); // Unsign&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;isn't needed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In .net (unlike Java) bytes are unsigned values from 0-255. A byte will never be negative.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:51:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Life of Pi Quotes</title><link>http://humani.st/life-of-pi-quotes/#comment-20775118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;a tie is a noose, and inverted though it is, it will hang a man nonetheless if he's not careful&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louthella</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:27:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Disqus Validation Errors on WordPress</title><link>http://humani.st/fix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress/#comment-19999394</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is exactly what I'm looking for, but unfortunatly when I run your site through the W3C validator it get's a bunch of errors: &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fhumani.st%2Ffix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress%2F&amp;amp;charset=%28detect+automatically%29&amp;amp;doctype=Inline&amp;amp;group=0&amp;amp;user-agent=W3C_Validator%2F1.654" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://validator.w3.org/check?...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I like this comment system a lot, but am not sure I want to use it since it's markup and CSS are not W3C compliant at all.  I may just say screw it and stick with it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devin Walker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:36:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Make Erlang a Functional Language?</title><link>http://humani.st/why-make-erlang-a-functional-language/#comment-17871379</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Erlang always copy data because strict process isolation and soft-realtime GC. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hynek (Pichi) Vychodil</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:33:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Disqus Validation Errors on WordPress</title><link>http://humani.st/fix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress/#comment-17846930</link><description>&lt;p&gt;nice blog, I like it&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://fayland.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Homepage&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:40:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Disqus Validation Errors on WordPress</title><link>http://humani.st/fix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress/#comment-17846653</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:36:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Fix Disqus Validation Errors on WordPress</title><link>http://humani.st/fix-disqus-validation-errors-on-wordpress/#comment-17842834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you++&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:13:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Single vs. Multiple Computer Setups</title><link>http://humani.st/single-vs-multiple-computer-setups/#comment-14620611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I use a three stage; server, desktop, ultra-portable. This has been the perfect combination for me for years. The server contains mass media, central repositories for development, public/private internet services, documents, finances, incremental backups, multi-user access for friends &amp;amp; family, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">clubpenguincheatcodes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:41:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>